Quantcast
Channel: The Girl Headlines on One News Page [United Kingdom]
Viewing all 17400 articles
Browse latest View live

Romany and Tom by Ben Watt – review

$
0
0
Sukhdev Sandhu enjoys Ben Watt's moving memoir of his parents' love story

Ben Watt, best known as one half of Everything But the Girl, says that one of the reasons he chose to study at Hull University at the start of the 1980s was because Philip Larkin was a librarian there. The melancholic poet's voice can be heard in the very first line of Romany and Tom: "We only ever see the second half of our parents' lives – the downhill part." And indeed the book begins with Watt's octogenarian father, Tom, in hospital, bronchial and leaking memories, reliant – if not always gratefully – on Romany, his ever more infirm wife.

This is a love affair told in reverse. Romany's great-grandfather was a horse-dealer and deer-stealer, a member of one of England's biggest Roma families. Her father was a Methodist minister who, under the name "Romany of the BBC", recorded a Children's Hour nature show that won many fans including the young Richard Attenborough and Terry Waite. She started out as a stage actor, and later became a celebrity interviewer and writer for Katie Boyle's hugely popular TV Times agony column. ("All black dogs, love rats and adult virgins," was how she once described it to her son. "And tips on how to keep your china sparkling.")

Tommy Watt, from working-class Glasgow, was a composer and bandleader who won an Ivor Novello award in 1957, was briefly leader of the BBC Northern Dance Orchestra, and a prominent figure in Centre 42, an experimental alliance between trade unions and leftwing artists. He recorded for George Martin's Parlophone label, but pop music's ascendancy destroyed the market for jazz big bands. By the early 1970s he was a jobbing arranger for the likes of the Beverley Sisters, before giving that up to become a decorator. Romany would be watching TV when she spotted someone they both knew: "Oh, look, Tom, Honor Blackman: you made a nice job of her downstairs loo."

Watt draws on his mother's notes and letters for much of the back story to their relationship. Romany and Tom were both married when they first met – she had four young children, including triplets. One of her diary entries, typically sharp and funny, records an adulterous encounter: "March 3: Prelims. Scones for tea … Unromantic humorous musical medley on out-of-tune piano. Offer of gin. Offer of another gin. Shoes off. The rest is history." She also kept her first husband's letters, and it's hard not to be moved reading the one he sent on the eve of their divorce that apologises "for the pain and boredom I have caused you".

Although modern pop stars, in Britain at least, seem to be getting posher, they tend to go to some lengths to obscure that fact. Watt's parents, settled in leafy Barnes and later Oxford, are probably more bohemian than bourgeois. Nevertheless, Romany and Tom is full of references to such anti-rock'n'roll places as Fernhill and Tockington, memories of trestle tables and earwigs found in bucolic pub gardens, and stories about the great and the good who lived nearby – arts broadcaster Humphrey Burton (his wife Gretel "scared me with a spaghetti carbonara"), radical historian of Africa Basil Davidson ("I repeatedly damaged his fruit netting with my football"), and Lord Woolf, Master of the Rolls ("I lost a shuttlecock over his garden fence").

Watt admits to wishing he could winch his parents from their bickering lives and transform them into "well-rounded and contented members of the imaginary happy middle class". But with their tics and disappointments, their frustrations and their drinking, they're as happy as the characters in a Mike Leigh film. One childhood memory he recounts may well be both the saddest and most English thing I've ever read: "We went down to the seafront one afternoon and my parents had a big row in public near the crazy golf. Then my mum walked off, and my dad took me for sausage and beans in the theatre canteen, and I ate while he smoked and stared out of the window."

Watt portrays himself, sometimes deliberately, as worried, an earnest striver. The book is about him almost as much as his parents, and gradually he begins to disclose what he regards as his own fatherly failings. All the same, this book reveals him as a comic writer of rare talent. A scene in which his father, a blind man and a chef break out of their care home on Finchley Road to get some drinks in at a nearby pub could have found its way into Edgar Wright's film The World's End. Romany asks him what the notices had been for an Everything But the Girl show: "Notices were what you got for performing in the theatre after the war, Mum."

Throughout he displays the same almost forensic attention to detail as he did in Patient (1996), his memoir of a life-threatening illness, at one point describing tumblers and mugs that had "the frosted rings brought on by dishwashers used without rinsing agent and salt". More tenderly he recalls his grandmother's "thick nylon stockings the colour of strong tea, the sugar-dusted travel sweets in her handbag, how she always spread her marmalade to the very outer edges of her toast".

Watt's earliest records – including his 1983 LP North Marine Drive – are neglected classics of the post-punk era. It's a shame he doesn't discuss them because when he does write about music he's consistently excellent. His description of jazz musician Don Weller – "a vast vagabond of a man with a dishevelled beard and a tenor saxophone that spat splinters"– could be straight out of But Beautiful, Geoff Dyer's 1991 superlative jazz study.

A latter-day house DJ and record-label boss, he's also terrific at evoking club culture: "Two or three hours of indulgence and escape; glass-rattling bass and air-punching exuberance, burnished with moments of pathos and blurred melancholy; and all the time the drum, the drum; a ritual where the room is bigger than any one individual within it; a fire that gets stoked then self-sustains."

"A ritual where the room is bigger than any one individual within it" actually sounds like a good description of a family. Neither sentimental nor savage, yet often wise, moving and entertaining within the same paragraph, Romany and Tom is a major achievement to rival any of Watt's recordings. Reported by guardian.co.uk 15 hours ago.

Ann Peebles: the girl with the big voice

$
0
0
'I can't stand the rain,' was a throwaway line that became a massive hit for Ann Peebles. Here she looks back on her career

There's a common cliche in music biopics that you might call the eureka fallacy. Our hero is having a conversation or strumming a guitar when inspiration strikes and boom! — there's the song that will define them forever. It always looks hokey and implausible but sometimes that's really how it happens.

One evening in Memphis in 1973, soul singer Ann Peebles was meeting friends, including her partner, Hi Records staff writer Don Bryant, to go to a concert. Just as they were about to set off, the heavens opened and Peebles snapped: "I can't stand the rain." As a professional songwriter in constant need of new material, Bryant was used to plucking resonant phrases out of the air and he liked the idea of reacting against recent R&B hits that celebrated bad weather, such as the Dramatics' In the Rain and Love Unlimited's Walking in the Rain (With the One I Love).

So he sat down at the piano and started riffing on the theme, weaving in ideas from Peebles and local DJ Bernie Miller. The song was finished that night and presented the next morning to Hi's studio maestro, Willie Mitchell, who used a brand new gadget, the electric timbale, to create the song's distinctive raindrop riff. It really was that easy. "We didn't go to the concert," Bryant remembers. "We forgot about the concert."

Pop music is the only artform where your life can be changed forever by one good night's work. In the short run, I Can't Stand the Rain made Peebles's name. In the years since, it has been covered and sampled by dozens of artists, including Tina Turner, Missy Elliott and Seal. Now it's emerging again, as five albums Peebles made for Hi are reissued. She would still be singing the song if not for a stroke two years ago. Her voice has been slow to recover so she speaks on the phone from Memphis with a slight slur and frequent heavy sighs, although her good humour and memory appear to be undimmed.

Peebles was born in St Louis, Missouri in 1947, the seventh of 11 children, all of whom sang in the Peebles Choir for her father, a Baptist minister. During a trip to Memphis with one of her brothers in 1968, she began singing with bandleader Gene "Bowlegs" Miller, who introduced her to his employers at Hi Records.

Founded in 1957, Hi was about to hit its stride as a soul label with releases from OV Wright, Otis Clay, Syl Johnson and its only superstar, Al Green. While Motown and Stax were fuelled by intense rivalries and bullish egos, Hi was a cosy operation, largely thanks to Mitchell. As artist, producer, songwriter and, eventually, vice-president, he set the tempo. His production style was smooth and inviting with just the right amount of heartache and southern grit.

*Listen to the Ann Peebles album I Can't Stand the Rain on Soundcloud here*

"Willie Mitchell was like a father and the musicians were like brothers," Peebles says. "It was like a family."

"He looked out for everybody," Bryant confirms. "He was easy to get along with as long as you were doing the things he wanted."

Mitchell put his new signing together with Don Bryant. Lifelong Memphis resident Bryant is a mellow, avuncular 71-year-old who seems to have nothing but good memories about his "real nice" time at Hi. However, the two didn't immediately click. "No we didn't," Peebles says, laughing. "We bumped heads."

Bryant resented being distracted from his solo career while Peebles didn't like being coached when she'd been singing since she was in kneesocks. But, gradually, they came to appreciate each other's strengths and realise how much they had in common. Their flourishing relationship soon bled into the songs. Written while they were on the road together, 1971's 99 Pounds ("Good things come in small packages") was Bryant's flirtatious gift to his new love. "I thought it would be a good introduction," he says. "A good song for her to brag on herself."

In 1974 they were married and celebrated their relationship on the song Until You Came into My Life. Peebles recites the lyric fondly: "'I never knew the meaning of true love.' We wrote that song together. 74 was a great year."

It was also when she met John Lennon, who was not having such a great year. This was during his infamous 18-month "lost weekend", when he swapped New York and Yoko Ono for a messy new life in LA. Lennon had excitably dubbed I Can't Stand the Rain "the best song ever" and went with friends to see Peebles perform at the Troubadour that February, where he proceeded to get hammered, stick a Kotex sanitary towel to his head and express his attraction to the singer in hair-raisingly graphic terms during her set.

"I don't think I was angry," says Peebles, amused by the memory. "I think I just smiled and kept singing."

Did he ever apologise? "Oh yeah, he really did. He was drinking. He didn't know what he was doing. He found me the next day at the hotel and he said: 'I'm so sorry. I made a monkey out of myself.' And I told him that was all right, I understood."

Peebles and Bryant couldn't have predicted that I Can't Stand the Rain would become part of the fabric of pop, despite reaching only No 38 on the US pop chart. "You could always feel good about a song but I don't think anybody knew for sure this would be a hit," says Bryant. "We were hoping that every song we did would be a hit." Nor did they realise it would prove unrepeatable. Peebles had 10 more R&B hits, including the magnificently vengeful I'm Gonna Tear Your Playhouse Down and the punchy, ominous Beware, but never came close to the mainstream again.

Some critics reckoned Peebles had the talent necessary to be a star but not the outsized personality. Mitchell had another theory. "She was the girl with the big voice who could have really gone further," he told Blues & Soul magazine in 1987. "But I don't think Ann spent enough time thinking about what she needed to do. I don't think she put as much energy into her career as a singer as some of the rest of these people."

Peebles doesn't exactly disagree. "I was happy the way I was. I still did a lot of songs but at that point I was married, I had a child and I was happy. Knowing [stardom] would take me away from what I was really like, it didn't bother me that much."

She recorded her last album for Hi in 1978, just after the label was sold and relocated to Los Angeles, then dropped out of sight for a decade. "It was kind of my choice," she says. "I tried other producers and it just wasn't the same. I was used to Willie coaching and telling me how to do things. It was hard to go into a studio and have somebody just sit there and push knobs."

Peebles has only made a handful of albums since. You wonder if she ever resents how that one night of bottled lightning has overshadowed everything else she's done, but resentment isn't her style. "It kept me going, everybody recording it," she says. "It helped me to know that somebody was listening and recognising my talents. Of course, there's a lot of stories in a lot of the songs I wrote but that's the one people recognised. I never get tired of telling that story."

• I Can't Stand the Rain and four other Hi albums by Ann Peebles are reissued on Fat Possum on 24 February. Reported by guardian.co.uk 6 hours ago.

Rise of the me first mothers: Changing nappies in restaurants. Brazenly promoting their little darlings. CATHERINE OSTLER identifies an infuriating new breed of parent

$
0
0
Rise of the me first mothers: Changing nappies in restaurants. Brazenly promoting their little darlings. CATHERINE OSTLER identifies an infuriating new breed of parent A flash of pink flew by, cutting so swiftly across my 76-year-old mother’s path that she was nearly knocked clean off the pavement. ‘Why didn’t you move out of the way?’ the girl’s mother barked, loudly. Reported by MailOnline 9 hours ago.

Why silent types get the girl

$
0
0
Study finds that men who use shorter average word lengths and concise sentences are preferred, while men who use verbose language are deemed less attractive
 
 
 
  Reported by Telegraph.co.uk 18 hours ago.

Who's that girl? Hero student wants to find teenager he saved...

$
0
0
Who's that girl? Hero student wants to find teenager he saved... A student is desperate to track down a teenage girl he saved from drowning in Tanzania.Marc Edwards was hailed a hero after pulling the 14-year-old from the water at Marangu Falls, in Kilimanjaro National Park, while on a volunteer working trip.Marc, from Livingston, near Edinburgh, said he was told the girl, who was on holiday with her family, is from Leicester.He contacted the Mercury in the hope of finding out who she is and to see how she is getting on.Marc told of how he pulled the... Reported by Leicester Mercury 17 hours ago.

US: Fox Host Bill O’Reilly says he is worried about ‘homosexual overtones’ in the girl scouts

$
0
0
Fox News Host Bill O'Reilly has recently criticised the Girl Scouts of the USA for hiring a spokesman who was a member of a "controversial punk band with homosexual overtones." The post US: Fox Host Bill O’Reilly says he is worried about ‘homosexual overtones’ in the girl scouts appeared first on PinkNews.co.uk. Reported by PinkNews 14 hours ago.

Strong, silent types DO get the girl: Men who use fewer, shorter words are seen as more manly and attractive

$
0
0
Strong, silent types DO get the girl: Men who use fewer, shorter words are seen as more manly and attractive Canadian researchers discovered that using shorter words and speaking more concisely are a masculine trait making 'silent types' are more attractive to women. Reported by MailOnline 13 hours ago.

My mum was murdered

$
0
0
Growing up, Kate Hilpern knew she was adopted but it wasn't until she was 18 and legally old enough to investigate her birth family, that she found out the truth: her mother had died in mysterious circumstances in India

Often called the Garden of Eden by western travellers, the foothills of the mighty Indian Himalayas have it all – snow-clad peaks, magnificent remote valleys and gorges, life-giving rivers and endless banks of wild flowers. There are worse places to spend the last week of your life.

The last thing on Susan East's mind was death. Like many young westerners in the late 60s and early 70s, she had been drawn to the hippy trail. It promised adventure and a new life, far away from Canterbury, where she had very recently given birth to a baby, given up for adoption.

I was that baby.

It is now understood that giving up a child for adoption is deeply traumatic for the mother but in those days there was little compassion or understanding. Instead there was a burden of shame attached to teenage pregnancy outside marriage. Susan's vision was fixed on India, home of the eastern philosophies that fuelled the hippy way of life, far from the traditional restrictions of society.

Her parents, kindly but conventional, did not want their fifth and youngest child to head off alone on such a dangerous journey. But two things worked in Susan's favour. First, the government reduced the age of majority from 21 to 18, and second, her grandmother gave her some money. Reluctantly, her parents waved her off.

Ten months after I was born in October 1971, Susan travelled first to Istanbul, the point at which all roads from Europe converged, continuing across Iran, which was then a secular country run by the shah, and on into Afghanistan, where foreigners were welcomed and, not insignificantly, the hashish was plentiful.

The wandering pot-smoking westerners always preferred the term "freaks" to "hippies" and must indeed have looked like freaks to the Afghans, who were largely unaccustomed to tourists of any sort. But people were hospitable and Susan loved Kabul.

The following May, Susan arrived in Manali, at the north of the Kullu Valley in India. She fell in love with the small town, famously beautiful, nestling under mountains that carved a sharp outline against the blue sky. Come winter, she planned to head south to the beaches of Goa.

But a few weeks later, Susan was dead.

There was no funeral, at least not for her family, because the cremation was quick, as was the custom in India. Worse, there was no explanation for Susan's death. In fact, the whole episode remained a mystery for almost 30 years – until I discovered that she had almost certainly been murdered.

To me, growing up, Susan was always a mysterious figure. In a middle-class family, there was only one thing for it, other than abortion, when a teenager got pregnant – to send the girl away to a mother-and-baby home, where a married couple would later collect the baby and the girl would have a chance to put the whole ghastly experience behind her. In my mother's case, not even her siblings knew about it.

For me, this meant a new life in a new family from when I was six weeks old. It was a life so cut off from the original one that even when Susan died the following summer, my family were not told. Indeed, all I knew about my adoption when I was growing up were three bare facts. First, my mother was 17 when I was born; second, she had been in a relationship with my father for at least a year; and third, she had a sibling with a musical talent.

It was the last fact that bothered me most as it meant weekly piano lessons with an old woman up the road who had bent fingers and a sharp tongue. My mum was only trying to honour the one thing she knew about my genes but unfortunately, the musical gene had passed me by.

Later on, the first two facts got me thinking. Did having me so young meant she'd forgotten about me? Did she look like me? What happened to my father?

My adoptive parents were, and are, my family. We named our daughter Lucy after my mum and when my dad died four years ago, the fact that he wasn't genetically connected never entered into how I felt. But by the time I was 18 – the age at which an adopted person can legally undertake a search for birth relatives in England, Wales and Northern Ireland – I felt a strong need to know my roots. It was 1989 and Susan would have been just 36, so while I was (sort of) prepared for her to turn me away when we met, the last thing I expected was that she would be dead.

Susan's parents, whom I met two days after discovering this news, welcomed me with warmth, exuberance and Canadian accents. They still lived in a 1950s house in Canterbury, where Susan had grown up after their move from Toronto when she was five. They revelled in telling me about her childhood. They invited me to call them Grandma and Grandpa and, best of all, showed me photographs. Even now, I find it hard to explain how astounding it is to see yourself reflected in someone else's features for the first time. At last, someone I looked like.

In retrospect, I suspect that day was far more overwhelming for Susan's parents than it was for me – they had lost their daughter at 18 and gained a granddaughter at 19, the very image of her.

I saw them often and they opened their hearts, admitting their embarrassment in allowing the adoption to ever take place. They told me that Susan had quickly changed her mind about it and got close to a nervous breakdown, especially when the authorities wouldn't even let her have a photograph of me (although they did give in) and how – against her parents' better judgment – she headed off to India.

Susan kept her promise to write regularly. Indeed, my grandparents still had the stack of Basildon Bond airmail letters, tied up neatly with string. I pored over the words, so full of description and promise, in writing so small that I had to hold a ruler under each line. The last letter was sent in May 1972. "I'm so grateful to you for giving me a chance to see some of India," she signed off.

The next letter was not from Susan, but some people she had met in India. They told my grandparents they were sorry to hear of Susan's death and included a couple of her personal things. That was how they found out their daughter was dead.

"She died of a broken heart," my grandmother used to say, shaking her head sadly. Pressed (tentatively, as I did not want to upset her) she said it was a tsetse fly. "Yes, that's it, it was sleeping sickness."

Knowing the tsetse fly doesn't live in India, I wondered if at last the truth might be coming out when she confided in me one day, "They tried to make out it was suicide, you know."

It transpired that Susan's brother had got life insurance for the whole family, but when Susan died, the company wouldn't pay, claiming she had killed herself. But they withdrew the claim and paid up. Perhaps, I concluded, my grandparents just didn't want to, or weren't able to, face thinking about what happened to her.

Two days after meeting my grandparents, I met my birth father, Mark. We formed a close bond right away. He was more curious. He had loved Susan. And he was certainly more clued up about the casualties of the hippy trail. But he was none the wiser about just how she had died. Nobody would ever know for sure, he said.

Despite my questions, though, it wasn't really how she'd died, but the fact that she was dead at all – that was the sticking point. I felt a huge wrench that I'd never know this woman who had been alive in my mind for so many years and who had given me life.

So I tried to get to know her, by talking to family and friends, anyone who had known her. Her friends described her as an intelligent girl with a wild nature, while her siblings knew her as conformist and sensible. Even the content of letters, which I'm so lucky to have, don't quite tally up. Four days after I was born, she wrote to my father with passion and sadness, then mentions nothing about either me or him in the letters posted on her travels.

Still, it helped, as did my trip to Susan's birth city of Toronto, when I was 21. I'd gone to meet my Canadian cousins and decided to spend a year there. One day, it occurred to me to ask the Canadian embassy if they had any details about Susan's death. To my amazement, they gave me not just her death certificate but the post-mortem results.

There in black handwriting, one stark word jumped out and shocked me to the core: Poisoning. Friends were sure it was probably food poisoning. But the documents said she was found unconscious alone by a river bank without her passport or money (neither of which were ever found). Something wasn't right.

"We should go to India," announced Mark after I'd returned to England. It would be a kind of pilgrimage for Susan, he said, and a tangible part of my bereavement. Besides, it was my only hope of discovering the truth about what really happened.

So, in 1999, 27 years after her death, we flew to Delhi and retraced Susan's steps as backpackers ourselves, eventually reaching Manali. Sure enough, the mountain scenery was striking, but disappointingly crammed with concrete hotels. In Susan's day, there had been a handful of guesthouses; now there were more than 650. At least the old town of Manali remained a peaceful sanctuary, with fewer dwellings and the clearest, cleanest air imaginable. The extreme poverty was profound, however, and with cannabis growing plentifully, the westerners spending all day high on pot was not a pretty sight either.

Susan died at the busy Kullu district hospital, where the staff working in the crumbling buildings took time out for us when it was quieter. When the chief doctor read our documents, she smiled sympathetically and explained, clearly not for the first time, that, yes, the poison was the type that is given to people with the aim of knocking them unconscious. It's usually put in pot, she said, and while some people survive, others don't. The objective is usually robbery. There was no doubt in her voice – she had seen such documents and heard such tales many times, and her peers confirmed that Susan's story was far from unique.

Stunned, I listened to how Kullu, originally named Kulanthapitha, which literally means "the end of the habitable world", has witnessed countless westerners killed or gone missing.

"Some people describe this area as lawless," said the chief doctor at Manali's smaller hospital where my mother was initially taken. "In some villages, there is a complete lack of principles. What's more, you will never find a local admitting to witnessing any kind of injury or death for he knows someone might punish him for it. So justice is rarely achieved or even sought."

The following night, we discovered this for ourselves as a 32-year-old Scot, who had arrived on the bus from Delhi that morning and whom we had seen in a bar that evening, was found dead on the roadside – nobody claimed to know anything about it. We thought of his poor family.

Things are worse now. Smoking hashish, at least among adults, has been part of the traditional culture for as long as anyone can remember. Young Kullu boys sniffing bonded resin and locals hooked so badly on heroin that they will never find work again has nothing to do with tradition. Nowadays, we learned, the stunning hills and gorges hide a community of dropouts and drug dealers far from the reach of embassies or even the local police, with the inevitable drug wars, drug-related crime and a huge number of deaths.

Indeed, four years after our trip, an article in this newspaper reported on the many British backpackers who come to Kullu in search of peace, tranquillity and the world's strongest hash, but whose battered bodies are washed up in the river or whose skeletons are found in sleeping bags. Murder, corruption and drug-trafficking flourish in this valley, the writer concluded.

On the last day of our trip, Mark and I visited the Bhuth Natha Temple on the banks of the river, where Susan was cremated. We knew the visit would be hard, but hoped to lay her spirit to rest. But there was nothing remotely dignified or even secluded about the stark metal grate, the exact size of a human body and riddled with rust. We scuttled off as quickly as we'd arrived, bewildered and tearful. But when we returned a few hours later, somehow the fatalistic, spiritual nature of India seemed to do its job and it wound up feeling a cathartic, if not apt, ending to our journey.

Mark and I don't talk much about what we discovered. Life goes on – I have since had a family of my own and he travels a lot – in any case, when I think back to that trip, I remember it more as a summoning up of her spirit, one that enabled us both to finally lay her ghost to rest. I also remember it as a uniquely special time for Mark and me. Perhaps most importantly, when I think of Susan now I like to focus on the life she had, not the death.

But from time to time, I am still haunted by it. I wonder whether the person who poisoned her ever felt a prick of conscience. I wonder if she knew she was dying during the last few days of her life. I wonder what she'd make of the world – and me and my family – now. Of course, the facts would be hard to come to terms with, no matter how she died. But they are all the more painful knowing her death was avoidable and that such deaths are happening more than ever and still leaving families with unanswered questions. Reported by guardian.co.uk 13 hours ago.

Beyoncé – review

$
0
0
*SSE Hydro, Glasgow*
Female empowerment meets hip-hop bravura as Beyoncé unleashes her new, improved Mrs Carter Show with added songs and flawless execution

When Beyoncé's Mrs Carter Show world tour arrived in the UK last spring, it had everything a high-end pop diva spectacle could want – an obsession with Marie Antoinette, sparkly purple catsuits, truly innovative lighting and video – and, of course, the titular Mrs Carter herself, the 17th most powerful woman in the world according to Forbes magazine, dangling off a fish-hook in mid-air.

There was also the not inconsiderable catalogue of hits stashed under her crinoline, most of which were stylishly remodelled for the occasion. The only thing that was lacking last year – other than daughter Blue Ivy on backing vocals and hubby Jay-Z bringing Beyoncé a cup of hot lemon water with honey in it – was the new album that tour was supposed to be touring.

Beyoncé (the "visual" LP) arrived very suddenly in December, sending critics into raptures, breaking iTunes records, outselling all other American pop divas in the fourth quarter and quite possibly revitalising the entire album format. You had to buy the whole thing in those first days, no downloading single tracks. For the closing Stateside Mrs Carter shows of 2013 (the second highest-grossing tour of 2013), Beyoncé stuck just one new song into the set list: XO, the love song to her fans.

Good as Mrs Carter was, you wouldn't normally review the same tour twice in a national newspaper. But this Glasgow gig kicks off a whole new Mrs Carter leg. This is the Mrs Carter Show Mk II, and the swanky SSE Hydro is glowing pink from the inside, perhaps in anticipation of new Beyoncé songs. And while much remains from Beyoncé's last jaunt around our parts – the impressive silhouette sequence, Les Twins (her French twiglet dancers) and If I Were a Boy interpolating the Verve's Bittersweet Symphony – a handful of actual new songs do receive their world live premiere (if you're not counting the Grammys and the Brits). It is, emphatically, not the same gig twice.

It even starts differently, with some disembodied portent: clanking and atmospherics that resolve themselves into Haunted, one of the more nagging and subtle melodies from Beyoncé. Beyoncé glides on in a glittery gown which transforms into a catsuit in time for the next song: the stand-out Drunk in Love, performed while slung wantonly across a chair. At the Grammys last month, Beyoncé did it alongside Jay-Z. A little disappointingly, Mr Carter is not on hand tonight to bear witness to one of the classier displays of erotic abandon. Most pop and R&B singers have to produce a simulacrum of arousal in their performances; quite often it's mechanistic and boring. Remarkably, though, the ecstatic yelps of Beyoncé's ad libs in Drunk in Love make you feel like she actually got tipsy and had the hots for her husband. There is a great deal of raunch to this tour – then, and now – but Beyoncé's cavorting feels a cut above the usual knee-jerk flaunt'n'grind of most other performers.

Later, a costume change interlude finds her discussing sensuality and power via a voiceover. We're in Madonna territory here – advanced sexy studies, the post-feminist module – but, crucially, it elicits none of the crude smirking that accompanied Madonna's Sex book so long ago. Blow – probably the most sexually explicit song on Beyoncé, among many – comes served in a disco-era wrap. The LED screen projection of Pac-Man eating his way through some cherries before keeling over is funny rather than risible.

Madonna always shirked the feminist label: Beyoncé, by contrast, embraces it, even as she pole dances with brio. A passage from a TEDx talk on women and development in Africa given by the writer Chimamanda Ngozi Adichie was one of the talking points of Beyoncé's album when it came out in December. Tonight, Flawless (the song which houses the sample) is introduced with significant excerpts from Adichie's feminist broadside written in giant lit-up capitals: Beyoncé's affiliation could not be plainer. "Feminist," the lights spell out: "a person who believes in the social, economic, and political equality of the sexes." But what happens next? The song interpolates a bit of Bow Down (Bitches) – the taster track that prefaced the arrival of Beyoncé; a song which deploys a term that is either insulting to all women, or just to bitches (a category that can include men, if you move in hip-hop circles). If you were, say, 18, like the girl called Julia to whom Beyoncé sings Happy Birthday at the end, you might be forgiven for being somewhat confused by this women's mag version of feminism: the "sexy powerfulness" tendency, rather than the school of thought that defends the right not to have to behave like a stripper. But it's cheering all the same.

There is no question as to Beyoncé's own powers. She can stop and start her all-female band – including backing vocalists and a horn section – with a click of her fingers, and keep climbing octaves until you think her lungs are about to jump out of her chest. She sings (with a range that only gets wider and deeper with every tour) and dances (flawlessly) for more than one and a half hours. Beyoncé and her team rehearsed all night on Monday into Tuesday morning to make sure everything in this new and improved Mrs Carter Show was up to scratch. It is.

Rating: 4/5 Reported by guardian.co.uk 9 hours ago.

Book review: Boy, Snow, Bird by Helen Oyeyemi

$
0
0
“Nobody ever warned me about mirrors”, begins the girl narrator of Boy, Snow, Bird – a novel that is primarily concerned with looks and surfaces, and the deceits that they can conceal. Reported by Independent 52 minutes ago.

Romany and Tom by Ben Watt – review

$
0
0
Ben Watt's vivid memoir about his bohemian parents captures their decline and the people they once were

Most famous for being one half of pop duo Everything But the Girl with his wife, Tracey Thorn, musician and DJ Ben Watt has plunged into his past before. In 1996, he wrote Patient, documenting his battle with Churg-Strauss syndrome, an autoimmune disease that often proves fatal. In short, perfect misery memoir stuff.

But Watt's prose was different – elegant, crisp and clean. His approach to tough subjects was also unflinchingly unsentimental. His second book, a memoir about and named after his parents, has a similar tone. Fans of Watt's music will recognise its mood: melancholic, but with a definite edge.

Romany and Tom's story begins near its end. It's May 2006, and Tommy Watt, Ben's father, now 80, is in hospital. The wearing details of age are on display: a pyjama jacket "misbuttoned and stretched open", his breathing "a flimsy wheeze of air". Memories creep into Watt's mind of childhood holiday weekends as he watches his father: "empty motor-oil bottles on the tideline, a stretch of beach, salt rime, gulls squabbling". The past keeps invading the present as it inevitably does in times of crisis.

Then his mother arrives, prompting other buried memories. Her face has the same look Watt remembers when he himself was in hospital: "half connected and involved; half ready to go home". She's a complicated character, brought to life brilliantly here. This scene also prepares us for the structure of Watt's memoir, which moves between now and then constantly, but dreamily, woozily. Such a timeline should be hard to follow, but it's not. Our hand is always in their son's hand.

We slowly discover that Watt's parents were formidable sorts in their prime. Tom was a working-class jazz musician who became a successful band leader, winning an Ivor Novello in the late 50s, and leading the Centre 42 big band in the early 60s. Romany was a Rada-trained actor whose career was cut short during her first marriage; after having her first child, she unexpectedly had triplets. She later became a successful feature writer and broadcaster, before her fortunes, as well as those of her second husband's, slowly trickled away. In Watt's recollections, their later years together are marked by mutual discord and the constant consumption of "large tumblers of brandy, not poured as a shot or even a double, but like full glasses of water".

Watt holds back the main mystery about his parents until later on, though – the circumstances under which these very different people came together. This is a difficult thing to pull off, but Watt achieves it, keeping our interest sustained in the rich, raw descriptions of their deteriorating worlds. It's all there in the tiny details Watt captures perfectly: empty fridges, crumpled clothes, the blood pooling on a bathroom floor. He's also good at the lighter moments. Romany's interview with Richard Burton and Liz Taylor shows the joy his mother used to exude, while stories from her life now, dented by dementia, remind us of who she once was. It's hard not to moved by his stories of her at her husband's funeral: "Thank you for a lovely day, whoever you are."

When we find out how Romany and Tom got together, however, and how Ben Watt came to be, the effect is like a blow to the heart. Here were two people who were once, inexplicably, deeply in love, who struggled to make everything work, whose past still can't be touched by the son who clearly thought the world of them. Near the end of the book, he writes: "They just let me be to get on with it, working things out for myself." The result of their love, on this evidence, has worked things out very well. Reported by guardian.co.uk 17 hours ago.

Spoiler alert: Downton Abbey is a waste of America's precious TV binge time | Martin Pengelly

$
0
0
In the opinion of one transplanted Brit, it's a soap opera as inept as any other - and it doesn't live up to the new US standard

The other night, rather behind the rest of the known planet and probably some parts still unknown – the deepest Amazon, say, where naked tribesmen agonize weekly over poor old Mary and Matthew – I sat down to catch up on my Downton Abbey.

It's mine by birthright, I suppose, as an Englishman in America, land of the free and home of the binge-watch. Beset with a small child, I had lost much of that free time, and thus fallen far behind – further even than the one-season lag the US must still endure. But perhaps I had enough in me to sync up in time for tonight's season-four finale on PBS.

Indeed, House of Cards may be America's weekend-killing addiction of the moment, but Downton, we are told, is worth it.

The Netflix political drama itself derives from a British series, a suave if aging shocker reanimated with American energy, camp and schlock-horror verve. In Downton, we have a living transplant, a stately if seductive fairytale playing out in the years around the first world war - a time of unchecked elite excess featuring frocks and frock coats that are really rather lovely ... or at least that's as far as I got.

This time around, two episodes was quite enough to remind me that America's love for this rotten show is drawn from the same well as that baseless love so many Americans maintain for the British royal family. You know it's not for you – in fact, it's rather silly. And you know it's not even worth an hour's attention on a Sunday evening, what with True Detective and soon, once again, Mad Men and Game of Thrones. Given the vigor of your own institutions, you know that, ultimately, it's beneath you.

But you watch it anyway.

America, you can do better than Downton Abbey.

You can do better TV, obviously. Where to start? At the beginning of the revolution, perhaps, with The Sopranos. Or with The Wire or Breaking Bad. Even with House of Cards, if you must. And, oh, how you must: at least half a million of you watched all 13 hours' worth of Frank Underwood's maneuvering last weekend.

I understand the need to binge. Oh, how I do. Before I became a parent, my wife was in New York and I was in London, and so I still had hour upon hour for such things. Back then, my entire social life seemed to revolve around Tony, Paulie, Carmela and Artie Bucco. I'd watch two or three episodes of the Sopranos each night and then call transatlantic to express my exhilaration, fear or both.

Surprisingly, I still got married, and once the resulting small child was safely asleep, we pitched into Mad Men, Orange Is the New Black and all the rest.

In such company, Downton Abbey is all show-off and no substance. It is little more than an enormous confidence trick played by writer Julian Fellowes, ITV and PBS on the world – and especially Americans, those suckers for something to talk about around the water cooler. If it looks good and the write-ups say it's good, it must be good. Right, America? Mustn't it even be ... grand?

Grand with what? Its ludicrous melodrama? With its stultifying lack of ambition beyond flogging the hoary old country-house potboiler of upstairs, downstairs and out over the hah-hah and back? Or with its script? With that insulting, inept, dashed-off, corned-beef hash of a script it force-feeds its hugely talented, entirely wasted cast?

It's a grand waste of time, is what it is, enough to leave David Chase, Matthew Weiner and a dozen other talented show-runners weeping into their martinis. Five seasons and Christmas specials – and counting? Big deal with NBC to rehash it all for the Gilded Age? For this?

America, you can do much better than Downton Abbey.

It thinks it's better than you, too. This is a show about class in the way that Britain is about class, which is the way in which America is supposedly not. And Downton is not just about the British class system. (If you want to read or see something about it, read or see The Shooting Party, quickly.) Downton is a product and expression of the British class system. A highly approving expression, a show of and for the 1%. And 99% of America doesn't need any more of that.

Downton's sickly harmony between nobs and proles is a ludicrous facade erected by an avowedly elitist Conservative life peer who is married to the daughter of a real one and once wrote a supposedly satirical novel called Snobs.

Poke this facade, even lightly, and it falls. The Granthams are top dogs. We are constantly told, by every character from Daisy the sweetly dim kitchen maid to the loveable old lord, that "times are changing". Cosmetic codswallop, I tell you. In Fellowes' world, which is the world of Britain's Conservative-led government, the times are not changing – and have not changed. Let the nobles lead, indeed.

Yet still the numberless hordes allow themselves to be cowed and babied, every Sunday night for five seasons and counting. And all while True Detective is on. It's extraordinary.

It's also extraordinary that I even made it through the season and a half that I did. I suppose it was because Downton, despite itself, kept offering consolations. However many times Fellowes allowed Anna the maid to comfort Cora or had Carson the butler offer lonely-hearts advice to Mary, there was always something to lull – or gull – me right back. A nicely delivered line here; a plausibly nasty edge to Thomas there. Or, tellingly enough for an angry but class-bound Brit, an opportunity to tell anyone and everyone I know that, back when I was in London, I used to work with the girl who became Lady Edith.

But this time, in America, re-engaging, I was brought up short. What did it was this: the realization that in the world of Downton Abbey everyone, but everyone, knows their place. The lords, the servants. Branson the chauffeur, who being both Irish and a bit of a lefty should have known his from the start, despite his wholly unlikely success in marrying in. Even, I suspect, everyone behind the camera, down to whatever is the crew equivalent of the girl who lights the fires. Even the audience.

Obviously, this worldwide love for the Granthams, as much as that for the cursed Windsors, springs from all humanity's love of a good soap opera. That I get. In that case, the best that can be said for the soap that is Downton Abbey is, well, at least the sets don't wobble.

But those sets being the unyielding walls of a genuine stately home, Highclere Castle (which could never be in Yorkshire, let me tell you), built with the blood and sweat of others for the continuing profit of a gang of genuine aristocrats, the whole thing should make anyone remotely normal feel distinctly, queasily ill.

America, you can do so much better.

Or if you really think you can't, there's always Sherlock, I suppose. Reported by guardian.co.uk 14 hours ago.

The Girl Who Soared Over Fairyland and Cut the Moon in Two by Catherynne M Valente – review

$
0
0
'The plot is a whirlwind, simple and full of humour, yet fast paced, unputdownable, and forever changing direction'

September is no ordinary girl. Since travelling to Fairyland and eating fairy food in the first book of this series, she is destined to return each and every year, until she is grown up.

But this time it's been so long she is beginning to wonder if her friends have forgotten about her. At last, though, the magical yet mischievous Blue Wind appears and transports her all the way to the moon, along with her beloved personified car, Aroostook, who has a great sense of humour. After all, a car is a Tool and, as the law says, Tools Have Rights.

Once on the moon, her joyful reunion with her friends Saturday, Ell and A-through-L (so called because she knows everything about everything that comes between those letters) is cut short, as she must work to save Fairyland from an evil moon-Yeti who wants to destroy them all.

This book was unlike anything I have ever read, a classic fairy tale with a humorous and modern twist. The only book it is vaguely comparable it is Alice in Wonderland, as it shares the same kind of style and 'oddness' .

The plot is a whirlwind, simple and full of humour, yet fast paced, unputdownable, and forever changing direction – I certainly had to make sure I wasn't thrown off at the corners as I was dragged through the chapters!

As a character, September is another strong, clever yet funny and interesting heroine to be added to the likes of Lyra (from Northern lights), Hermione (from Harry Potter) and Ren (from Chronicles of Darkness), all of which are some of my favourite characters and books of all time – if you haven't read them, you certainly should!

This is also one of a rare class of funny books for older children, being full of strange and ridiculous names, concepts and goings on, all of which seem somehow perfectly sensible! For instance, it is legal to be a Criminal, but only if you are licensed by the King and given a certificate to prove it – then you can do anything you like!

As another example, the author has come up with the ingenious idea that all the photos ever taken of someone trap past versions of themselves inside the photo, so that they are never the same after it has been taken, as they have lost part of themselves. As I said, it's totally mad, but it makes for a very interesting and unusual story!

It's not only a lighthearted read-through. When September meets future (yet to be) versions of Saturday, she begins to ponder a deep philosophical question: do we ever really have any choices in what we do?

I also love the title – although not snappy, it makes a change from the usual one word titles on many teen books. Only thing I'm not sure about is the 'cut the moon in two' part, as this didn't seem to happen, though she certainly disturbed it a lot!

This is part of what is currently a trilogy, and I can't wait to read the other two books. It does seem to be best to read the other two first, as, although I enjoyed this as a stand-alone novel, it refers to the others and seems to be a bit of a spoiler.

All in all a great book, that's bound to become treasured. Reported by guardian.co.uk 10 hours ago.

Heroes is back – what other rubbish shows should they resurrect?

$
0
0
Following the news that the unloved superhero drama is making a return to our screens, we imagine how some other shows, such as Lost and FlashForward, could be brought back to life

Spoiler alert: this blog discusses key plot points from past series, including Lost, FlashForward and Dexter.

Taken on its own, the news that NBC plans to revive Heroes – the superhero series that died unloved of its own stupidity in 2010 – is fully inexplicable. The series blew through whatever scant promise it had in the space of a single series, only to limp on so doggedly for so long afterwards that nobody can realistically ever want to see it again.

However, taken in the context of the upcoming 24 revival, the news is ever so slightly worrying. Television's big new thing, it seems, is to take shows from a decade ago and jerk them back into life by whatever means necessary. Given that the 24 reboot appears to be about Jack Bauer's dad escorting The Girl with the Dragon Tattoo to Buckingham Palace, and that the Heroes reboot is going to be a Heroes reboot, there's little to suggest that these revivals will have very much going for them at all. But it's too late for concern. Here's what we can expect to happen in some of these revivals.

*Lost*

Jack's eyes snap open, again. It turns out that he didn't die in the last scene of the original series after all; he was simply having a bit of a nap. However, all the baddies have died and all his friends have escaped on the plane, so he's the only one left on the island. The miniseries follows his miserable efforts to inject some drama into a story about a bloke in a forest. First he puts a plaster cast on a pig's leg and then gets in a huff when it doesn't show him the correct amount of gratitude. Then he tries to initiate a love triangle between himself, his own shadow and a pebble. Finally he farts into a handful of dirt, shouts, "Oh no, the smoke monster!" and hides up a tree for six weeks.

*Studio 60 on the Sunset Strip*

Matthew Perry is still the head writer of a bizarrely popular live comedy show. However, his job continues to get harder and harder due to a number of factors. The way that nobody at the network likes the show. The way that the lead actress, who is apparently brilliant, can still only really do impressions of people who were famous a minimum of 20 years ago. The way that whenever Perry so much as glances as a bottle of prescription medication, he automatically has a tedious four-hour flashback to a moment in his life that only he thinks is any way profound. The way that his work is literally interrupted every two seconds by someone bursting into his office to embark on a directionless and needlessly wordy rant about America's foreign policy. The way that all the corridors in his building are far too long and don't actually go anywhere. The way that his show doesn't contain a single joke. That sort of thing.

*FlashForward*

Joseph Fiennes, Jack Davenport and Dominic Monaghan sit around a table and try to remember what FlashForward was actually about. "Didn't everyone fall over at the same time or something?" Davenport asks. "I think so. There might have been a giraffe in the first episode, but I could be wrong," replies Monaghan. "Then what happened?" Davenport asks. There's a long silence. Everyone shrugs. "Actually, let's not bother," Monaghan says after a few minutes. As they start to get up, Fiennes yells "BECAUSE I WAS LOADED, OK?". Monaghan and Davenport stare at their feet. It is a profoundly awkward moment.

*Dexter*

The series just ended, but it's still ripe for a revival. We meet Dexter, who is still a bearded lumberjack who still does nothing but silently stare into the camera. That's all he does. Each of the 10 new episodes is just Dexter in a crummy fake beard sitting inside a hut and staring at the camera. Spoiler alert: in the season finale, Dexter's lumberjack boss shouts: "You're fired!" through his letterbox. Dexter blinks. The end.

Which shows would you like to revive? Let us know below. Reported by guardian.co.uk 1 day ago.

Schoolgirl killed in crash with school coach in Bloxwich, West Midlands

$
0
0
Schoolgirl killed in crash with school coach in Bloxwich, West Midlands The girl, who has not yet been identified but is thought to have been a teenager, was fatally injured at around 8.17am in Bloxwich, West Midlands. Reported by MailOnline 16 hours ago.

Skewen man, Anthony Tierney, 67, in sex attack on teenage girl,...

$
0
0
Skewen man, Anthony Tierney, 67, in sex attack on teenage girl,... A TEENAGE girl was sexually assaulted by a man while the pair were both in a lift.Anthony Tierney, aged 67, grabbed the 17-year-old by her shoulders before kissing her on her face and rubbing her back, prosecutor Linda Baker said.Tierney, who city magistrates were told has learning difficulties, cornered the girl in a lift.He began talking to her but then moved towards her, trapping her into a corner. She was worried he would kiss her and she then saw him move his head towards her.She... Reported by South Wales Evening Post 20 hours ago.

Pensioner on trial accused of sexually abusing girl in Devon...

$
0
0
Pensioner on trial accused of sexually abusing girl in Devon... A lorry driver allegedly abused a girl in the cab of his Devon County Council truck in a railway siding, a jury have been told. Gerald Boston, aged 77, also assaulted the girl at his home when she was aged ten to 13, Exeter Crown Court heard. He is a retired county council worker who is alleged to have carried out some of the assaults in the cab of his truck when he took it home at evenings or weekends. Boston, of Highweek Street, Newton Abbot, denies four offences of indecent assault which... Reported by Tiverton Mid Devon Gazette 20 hours ago.

Child marriage in Nepal: what do you do when it's by choice?

$
0
0
In a society where dating is not the norm, more Nepalese teenagers are choosing to elope, forcing NGOs to change their assumptions about early and forced marriage

When 14-year-old Deumaya from Gorkha district in Nepal, talked about getting married, she said: "I met my husband in the village. He is two years older than me. It was a love marriage – we were in love. We went to another village and stayed there for some time. When we came back, people said we were married."

Deumaya's story is common in many rural Nepalese communities. While the number of child marriages have been decreasing, a staggering 41% of women still get married before they turn 18 (pdf) despite the fact that the legal age of marriage is 20.

Despite child marriage being a human rights violation and the negative effects on girls and subsequently their children being well documented (pdf), in rural Nepal, an increasing number of these unions are considered love marriages. This is seen to be different from traditional arranged marriages, where two families come together and arrange their children's future spouse. In villages, dating is often impossible because of social norms. When an adolescent couple decides to be together, marriage – often by eloping against their parents' wishes – is their only choice. This practice is known to them as love marriage.

Nepal is a culturally diverse country, and the prevalence of love marriages varies between communities, regions, castes and ethnic groups. Earlier studies estimated that about 10% of marriages in rural areas were decided by the girl. We know from our interviews in the field that love marriages among adolescents are a growing trend, and more recent research confirms that more than 25% of marriages are based on the girl's decision (pdf).

Parents attribute the growing popularity of love marriage to increased literacy and access to mass media, such as Hindi soap operas. Mobile phones are also said to play a large role by enabling adolescents to talk to their peers without their parents' knowledge.

This new reality complicates many development assumptions that operate within a neat divide of regressive traditions versus progressive modern values. We have talked to many community members who told us that while awareness of child marriage grows among adults, the invasion of modern behaviours, brought by development, media, capital, and migration, now perpetuate early marriage among adolescents.

Local and international NGOs have for years called for policymakers to prioritise the issue of child marriage. There is also a rising demand for accountability and enforcement of existing legislation. Education is the best prevention against child marriage and activists recommend that efforts have to be made to improve not only girls' enrollment, but also retention. However, when early marriage happens because of a girl's decision, new challenges and opportunities arise for programmes aimed at ending the cultural practice of arranged child marriages.

So what does this new trend mean for current work? How should development actors reflect it in their programmes? The obvious goal is to increase adolescents' awareness of disadvantages of child marriage, as many organisations already do. At Her Turn our workshops for girls aged 10 to 14 include child marriage in the curriculum. Our experience shows that as long as girls receive the knowledge of health and social issues surrounding child marriage, they not only decide to not marry early, but also create protective peer pressure that has a positive impact on their friends.

But there is one channel that reaches almost all adolescents and has tremendous untapped potential: the national school curriculum. Net enrollment for primary schools already exceeds 95% for both boys and girls and will soon reach 100% (pdf), meaning that every child can be taught the same things about child marriage that programmes like ours teach, in every school in the country. This also means that those most at risk, marginalised children, low caste, impoverished, and remote students, will have an excellent chance to make an informed adult decision.

Deumaya is luckily still in school, but she doesn't know for how long. Her parents initially did not support her marriage, but once she eloped, they had to agree and she moved to her in-laws house. Her chores in her new household leave little time to study. She says she is happy with her new family, but she also reflects on her choice: "If I knew what I've now learned, I wouldn't have married."

Ola Perczynska is programme manager at Her Turn, Kathmandu, Nepal

*Join the community of global development professionals and experts. **Become a GDPN member** to get more stories like this direct to your inbox* Reported by guardian.co.uk 20 hours ago.

Why Jennifer Lawrence Deserves A Year Off From Hollywood

$
0
0
Jennifer Lawrence must be exhausted. The girl has barely stopped working since she starred in her first movie, Garden Party, back in 2008. Over the... Reported by ContactMusic 19 hours ago.

Nile Ranger accused of raping girl who was too drunk to consent

$
0
0
Nile Ranger accused of raping girl who was too drunk to consent A West soccer star raped a woman in a hotel after pestering her for weeks 'to be his girl', a court was told yesterday. Swindon Town striker Nile Ranger is accused of raping the girl after the pair had been out together in Newcastle city centre. The striker, who played for Newcastle United last season, denies the charge that relates to an incident that took place in January 2013. Christine Egerton, prosecuting, said the alleged victim could remember being together at Empress bar in Newcastle... Reported by Western Daily Press 18 hours ago.
Viewing all 17400 articles
Browse latest View live


<script src="https://jsc.adskeeper.com/r/s/rssing.com.1596347.js" async> </script>